Eliminates Frequently Encountered Odours*1~3

(Not a result of experiments in an actual use environment)

Various odours in living room

nanoe™ particles, which are smaller than steam particles, penetrate the deepest parts of fibers, allowing for highly effective deodorisation.*1~3 OH radicals reach the sources of the odours themselves and suppress them until they are barely noticeable.

How nanoe™ Works

1 nanoe™ reliably reaches odours embedded in fibres.

2 OH radicals break down odour causing substances.

3 Odour is eliminated.*1~3

Effects of nanoe™

Pause

Cigarette smoke odour *1

Effect of nanoe™ on ciggarette smoke odour level intensity against time

nanoe™ reduces odour intensity by 1.2 levels in 2 hours.

Scalp odour *2

Effect of nanoe™ on scalp odour level intensity against time

nanoe™ reduced scalp odour intensity massively in 6 hours.

Garbage odour *3

Effect of nanoe™ on garbage odour level intensity against time

nanoe™ reduced garbage odour intensity in 1 hour.

Inhibits Activity of Airborne, Adhered Bacteria*4~6 & Viruses*7~9

(Not a result of experiments in an actual use environment)

Airborne,adhered bacteria & viruses in living room

nanoe™ envelops and inhibits the activity of airborne and adhered bacteria*4~6 and viruses.*7~9

How nanoe™ Works

1 nanoe™ reliably reaches viruses.

2 OH radicals transform virus proteins.

3 Virus activity is inhibited.*4-9

Effects of nanoe™

Pause

Airborne bacteria

Effect of nanoe™ on number of airborne bacteria against time

Airborne viruses

Effect of nanoe™ on number of airborne viruses against time

Adhered bacteria

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate of adhered bacteria (O157) before testing and 2 hours later

Adhered bacteria

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate of adhered bacteria (MRSA) before testing and 2 hours later

Adhered viruses

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate of adhered viruses (influenza virus H1N1) before testing and 2 hours later

Adhered viruses

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate of adhered viruses (poliovirus type1) before testing and 2 hours later

Inhibits Airborne Mould*10 & Adhered Mould*11 Activity

(Not a result of experiments in an actual use environment)

Kitchen interior

Various types of airborne mould*10 found inside rooms are inhibited. Furthermore, even adhered mould*11 is enveloped and inhibited by nanoe™.

How nanoe™ Works

1 nanoe™ reliably reaches mould.

2 OH radicals denature mould proteins.

3 Mould activity is inhibited.*10*11

Effects of nanoe™

Airborne mould *10

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate of airborne mould survival rate against time

Adhered mould *11

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate of adhered mould survival rate against time

8 Varieties of Household Mould Are Inhibited

Major types of mould found in house dust:

Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Alternaria, Fusarium, Penicillium, Eurotium

Mopping dust on the floor

Mouldfound in bathrooms:

Stachybotrys*17

Mould build up in the bathroom

Mould found in soil:

Mucor (Taking into account airborne transfer of mould from soil into the home environment)*18

Human entering house with dirty feet

Inhibits Pet-derived Allergens*14 and Major Allergens*14

(Not a result of experiments in an actual use environment)

A girl with two dog on tle floor

In addition to allergens*14 from sources such as dog/cat dander*14, mite faeces/carcasses*14, ​and airborne mould*14, other major allergens*14 can also be inhibited.

How nanoe™ Works

1 nanoe™ reliably reaches allergens.

2 OH radicals denature allergen proteins​.

3 Allergen is inhibited.*14

Types of Pollen That nanoe™ Can Inhibit

Cedar

Cypress

Orchard Grass

Ragweed

Breakdown/inhibition of Hazardous Substances*15 Known To Be Found In PM2.5

(Not a result of experiments in an actual use environment)

Overview of city from rooftop

Breakdown effect of aromatic carboxylic acid (benzoic acid) and paraffin (hexadecane), harmful substances, have been verified.*15

How nanoe™ Works

1 nanoe™ reliably reaches hazardous substance​.

2 OH radicals denature hazardous substance proteins​.

3 Hazardous substance is inhibited.​*15

Effects of nanoe™

Aromatic carboxylic acid

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate of benzoic acid survival rate after 1 hour and 16 hours later

Paraffin

Effect of nanoe™ on survival rate ofhexadecane survival rate after 4 hours and 24 hours later

What Are Hazardous Substances?

PM2.5 particles include a variety of hazardous substances with sources that are unlikely to be eliminated.

PM2.5 generation route diagram

For these reasons, it can be said that we are constantly exposed to risks from various hazardous substances.

Moisturised Skin*16*17 & Straighter, Sleeker Hair*18

(Not a result of experiments in an actual use environment)

A lady looking into the mirror and washing face.

nanoe™ combines with natural sebum to coat the skin, leading to smooth, well-hydrated skin.*16*17 Furthermore, the abundant moisture found in nanoe™ hydrates the hair, contributing to straighter, sleeker hair.*18

Leads to Smooth, Well-hydrated Skin*16*17

Moisture escapes and corneum sloughs off without nanoe™ diagram

Moisture Escapes
[Initially]
Moisture escapes, and skin dries out.

Corneum Sloughs Off
[28 days later]
Skin texture deteriorates, and corneum sloughs off.

Moisture evaporation stop and corneum maintained after effect of nanoe™ diagram

Stops Moisture Evaporation
[Initially]
nanoe™ X combines with natural sebum to coat the skin.

Corneum Is Maintained And Smooth
[28 days later]
Leads to smooth, well hydrated skin.

Skin condition without nanoe™

Skin condition with nanoe™

Furthermore, Keeps The Skin Moisturised*16*17

Graph of improvement in skin moisture with nanoe™

nanoe™ achieved an improvement in skin moisture.*17

Hair Is Straighter And Smoother With nanoe™*18

Comparison between with nanoe™ versus without nanoe™ on hair strand

The hair’s moisture balance fails, leading to frizzy hair. With difficulty reflecting light, gloss is reduced and texture is grainy.

Helps the hair achieve a proper moisture balance, making for shiny hair that reflects light and allows fingers to be run through it smoothly.

Disclaimer

*1 [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method] Verified using the six-level odour intensity scale method in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Deodorisation method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Surface-attached cigarette smoke odour [Test result] Odour intensity reduced by 1.2 levels in 2 hours (BAA33-130125-D01)
*2 [Testing organisation] Odour and Aroma Design Course, Department of Integrated Informatics, Faculty of Informatics, Daido University [Testing method] Verified using the six-level odour intensity scale method in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Deodorisation method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Simulated body odour of middle-aged and older people attached to pillow cover [Test result] Odour intensity reduced by 0.65 levels in 6 hours
*3 [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method] Verified using the six-level odour intensity scale method in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Deodorisation method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Surface-attached garbage odour
[Test result] <Methylmercaptan> Odour intensity reduced by 1.2 levels in 1 hour (1V332-180316-K21) <Trimethylilamine> Odour intensity reduced by 0.9 levels in 1 hour (1V332-180316-K22)

Deodorisation effect varies according to the environment (temperature and humidity), operation time, odour, and fabric types. It does not eliminate toxic substances in cigarettes (carbon monoxide, etc.). Odours that are continuously generated (e.g., building material odours and pet odours) are not completely eliminated.

*4 <Airborne bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus)> [Testing organisation] Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science [Testing method] The number of bacteria is measured after direct exposure in an approximately 25㎥ sized airtight test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Airborne bacteria [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99.7% in 4 hours (24_0301_1)
*5 <Adhered bacteria (O157)> [Testing organisation] Japan Food Research Laboratories [Testing method] Measured the number of bacteria adhered to a cloth in an approximately 45L sized airtight test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Adhered bacteria [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99.99% in 1 hour (208120880_001)
*6 <Adhered bacteria (MRSA)> [Testing organisation] Japan Food Research Laboratories [Testing method] Measured the number of bacteria adhered to a cloth in an approximately 45L sized airtight test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Adhered bacteria [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99.99% in 1 hour (208120880_002)
*7 <Airborne virus (bacteriophageΦχ174)> [Testing organisation] Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science [Testing method] The number of virus is measured after direct exposure in an approximately 25㎥ sized airtight test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Airborne virus [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99.7% in 6 hours (24_0300_1)
*8 <Adhered virus (Influenza virus H1N1 subtype)> [Testing organisation] Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science [Testing method] Measured the number of virus adhered to a cloth in an approximately 1㎥ sized airtight test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Adhered virus [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99.9% in 2 hours (21_0084_1)
*9 <Adhered virus (Poliovirus type1(Lsc-2ab))> [Testing organisation] Kitasato Research Center for Environmental Science [Testing method] Measured the number of virus adhered to a cloth in an approximately 45L sized airtight test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Adhered virus [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99.7% in 2 hours (22_0096)

*10 [Testing organisation] Japan Food Research Laboratories [Testing method] Measured the number of mould altered in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Airborne mould [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99% in 1 hour (205061541-001)
*11 [Testing organisation] Japan Food Research Laboratories [Testing method] Measured mould adhered to a cloth [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Adhered mould [Test result] Inhibited by at least 99.5% in 8 hours (11038081001-02)
*12 Kosuke Takatori, 2002 (Mould Inspection Manual Colour Illustrated Catalogue) p. 382 TECHNO SYSTEMS, Inc.
*13 Kosuke Takatori, 2002 (Mould Inspection Manual Colour Illustrated Catalogue) p. 44-45 TECHNO SYSTEMS, Inc.
*14 <Dog-derived allergens and cat-derived allergens> [Testing organisation] Institute of Tokyo Environmental Allergens [Testing method] Direct exposure in a 45L airtight container and measured using the ELISA method [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] dog derived allergens, cat derived allergens [Test result] <Dog (dander)> Inhibited by at least 99% in 1 hour (11M-RPTAPRO47_1) <Cat (dander)> Inhibited by at least 98% in 2 hours (11M-RPTAPR051_1) <Mite faeces/carcasses> [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method] Measured allergen attached to a cloth, using the ELISA method, in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Attached mite allergens [Test result] Inhibited by at least 60% in 24 hours (BAA33-130304-F04) <Mould-derived allergens> [Testing organisation] Institute of Tokyo Environmental Allergens [Testing method] Direct exposure in a 45L airtight container and measured using the ELISA method [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Mould-derived allergens [Test result] Inhibited by at least 93% in 2 hours (11M-RPTMAR076_1) <Pollen> Cedar [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method] Measured allergen attached to a cloth, using the ELISA method, in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Cedar pollen [Test result] Inhibited by at least 88% in 8 hours (BAA33-130304-F01) Cypress, Orchard grass, Ragweed [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method] Verified using the electrophoresis method in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Cypress pollen, Orchard grass pollen, Ragweed pollen [Test result] Inhibiting effect was confirmed in 24 hours (1V332-171010-F04, 1V332-171010-F02, 1V332-171010-F01)
*15 [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method] Measured the amount of attached organic substances in an approximately 23㎥ sized test room [Inhibition method] nanoe™ released [Test result] <Aromatic carboxylic acid (benzoic acid)> Broken down at least 99.9% in approximately 16 hours (Y13NF135) <Paraffin (hexadecane)> Broken down at least 99% in approximately 24 hours (Y13NF136)
*16 [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method & test result] Approximately 34㎥ sized test room, room temperature 23 degrees Celsius, humidity 30%, 8 women aged 30~49 with varying skin conditions ranging from being averagely moist to dry, the stratum corneum water content was measured before and after resting for 90 minutes being exposed to a nanoe™ generating device, to find the average value of the change. (D01-071219F-01)
*17 [Testing organisation] FCG Research Institute, Inc. [Testing method and test result] Of 20 women 40 ± 2 years old, 10 women used a nanoe™ generating device at home for 28 days, while the other 10 women used a device with no nanoe™ generating device for 28 days at home. (19104)
*18 [Testing organisation] Panasonic Product Analysis Center [Testing method and test result] Approximately 46㎥ sized test room, room temperature 25 degrees Celsius, humidity 40%. Bundles (6 bundles) of hair were suspended 2m from a nanoe™ generating device, with repeated operation of the nanoe™ generating device: 8 hours on and 16 hours off. (D01-091005-01TM) [Method] nanoe™ released [Test substance] Hair

Results may vary based on usage, and seasonal and environmental variables (temperature and humidity). nanoe™ X and nanoe™ inhibit activity or growth of viruses, but do not prevent infection.